<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rdf:RDF 
         xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
         xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
         xmlns:mn="http://usefulinc.com/rss/manifest/"
         xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

  <channel rdf:about="http://www.nvidiaforums.com/viewforum.php?f=4&amp;fx=Performance">
    <title>Performance</title>
    <link>http://www.nvidiaforums.com/Performance-f4.html</link>
    <description>Performance: Recent 20 threads</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.nvidiaforums.com/GeForce-Go-6600-refresh-rate-is-low-no-matter-what-t89537.html" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.nvidiaforums.com/Physics-accelerator-When-did-this-come-out-t89509.html" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.nvidiaforums.com/relative-system-performance-t89362.html" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.nvidiaforums.com/High-performance-dual-monitors-t89300.html" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.nvidiaforums.com/2D-Performance-test-t89277.html" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.nvidiaforums.com/2D-Clock-Speed-on-HTPC-Video-Acceleration-Performance-t89270.html" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.nvidiaforums.com/FX5200-odd-performance-problem-t80812.html" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.nvidiaforums.com/GeForce-III-Ti-200-performance-under-linux-t80826.html" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.nvidiaforums.com/GF5200-fx-Sparkle-performance-problems-t80612.html" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.nvidiaforums.com/doom-III-performance-t80602.html" />
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel>

  <item rdf:about="http://www.nvidiaforums.com/GeForce-Go-6600-refresh-rate-is-low-no-matter-what-t89537.html">
    <link>http://www.nvidiaforums.com/GeForce-Go-6600-refresh-rate-is-low-no-matter-what-t89537.html</link>
    <title>GeForce Go 6600 - refresh rate is low no matter what</title>
    <description>Hi,

I've been very happy with my laptop (Toshiba Qosmio F25) and highly
recommend it to others. It has been able to handle any game/application
I throw at it. The graphics card is GeForce Go 6600, which has worked
perfectly with my games such as GTA SA and NFS Most Wanted for several
months..</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 1 Apr 2006 22:49:08 PST</pubDate>
  </item>

  <item rdf:about="http://www.nvidiaforums.com/Physics-accelerator-When-did-this-come-out-t89509.html">
    <link>http://www.nvidiaforums.com/Physics-accelerator-When-did-this-come-out-t89509.html</link>
    <title>Physics accelerator? When did this come out?</title>
    <description>Seen that the Dell &quot;Renegade&quot; system included a Physics
accelerators card. How exactly does this thing work, and is there any
games taking adavantage of such a thing? DirectX maybe?</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Mar 2006 19:04:51 PST</pubDate>
  </item>

  <item rdf:about="http://www.nvidiaforums.com/relative-system-performance-t89362.html">
    <link>http://www.nvidiaforums.com/relative-system-performance-t89362.html</link>
    <title>relative system performance</title>
    <description>OK... no idea if this info will help anyone considering upgrading from 
System X to System Y. I see people posting quite often asking if they should 
upgrade or not and if so, to what. So... maybe this will help.

3dMark 05 scores from 2004-08 thru 2006-01

2004-08
FX-51 (Athlon 64 2.2ghz)..</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2006 22:20:04 PST</pubDate>
  </item>

  <item rdf:about="http://www.nvidiaforums.com/High-performance-dual-monitors-t89300.html">
    <link>http://www.nvidiaforums.com/High-performance-dual-monitors-t89300.html</link>
    <title>High performance dual monitors?</title>
    <description>I've heard that higher end cards perform better at higher 
resolutions. Does that mean a higher end card would shine in dual 
monitor applications like Flight Simulator 2004 when the total 
number of pixels is about double? 

Anybody know the specific attributes that are good for dual monitor..</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2006 16:01:56 PST</pubDate>
  </item>

  <item rdf:about="http://www.nvidiaforums.com/2D-Performance-test-t89277.html">
    <link>http://www.nvidiaforums.com/2D-Performance-test-t89277.html</link>
    <title>2D Performance test</title>
    <description>I need some assistance to determine whether my graphics card, memory needs
upgrading or a bug in Windows XP.

If you are willing to help do follow these instructions very closely;

Set your display driver to 16-bit (if its in 16-bit already switch to 32-bit
/ 24-bit then back to 16-bit) but ..</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2006 09:41:22 PST</pubDate>
  </item>

  <item rdf:about="http://www.nvidiaforums.com/2D-Clock-Speed-on-HTPC-Video-Acceleration-Performance-t89270.html">
    <link>http://www.nvidiaforums.com/2D-Clock-Speed-on-HTPC-Video-Acceleration-Performance-t89270.html</link>
    <title>2D Clock Speed on HTPC &amp; Video Acceleration Performance</title>
    <description>I have a 6600GT card in a HTPC machine which does pretty much does
MPEG-2 and WMV decoding acceleration through the PureVideo decoder all
the time, and pretty much never uses 3D mode at all.

Would increasing the 2D mode GPU clock and memory speed improve the
decoding speed of PureVideo?  How..</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2006 18:00:57 PST</pubDate>
  </item>

  <item rdf:about="http://www.nvidiaforums.com/FX5200-odd-performance-problem-t80812.html">
    <link>http://www.nvidiaforums.com/FX5200-odd-performance-problem-t80812.html</link>
    <title>FX5200 odd performance problem</title>
    <description>Hello

Well, before you start screaming that I should have gotten a faster card 
I have to tell, that I read about the FX5200 and it seemed to satisfy 
all my requirements and I knew that it was a budget card, but hey MX440 
was also a budget card so I didn't expect it to be worse than MX440 ..</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2003 10:19:47 PST</pubDate>
  </item>

  <item rdf:about="http://www.nvidiaforums.com/GeForce-III-Ti-200-performance-under-linux-t80826.html">
    <link>http://www.nvidiaforums.com/GeForce-III-Ti-200-performance-under-linux-t80826.html</link>
    <title>GeForce III Ti 200 performance under linux</title>
    <description>I have the above mentioned card installed on my computer i have both WinXp
and Linux Debian (Woody/Sarge/Sid).
When i run America's Army: Operations under WinXp it all goes fine, the
graphics are fast and of good quality, but when i run the same game under
Linux the graphics are good in closed..</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2003 14:31:47 PST</pubDate>
  </item>

  <item rdf:about="http://www.nvidiaforums.com/GF5200-fx-Sparkle-performance-problems-t80612.html">
    <link>http://www.nvidiaforums.com/GF5200-fx-Sparkle-performance-problems-t80612.html</link>
    <title>GF5200 fx  - Sparkle - performance problems</title>
    <description>hi!

my config:

amd 2,4ghz
gf 5200 fx (sparkle)
winXP
directx 9.0


on 3dmark2001 i get only about 3500 points. according to online 
benchmark tests this configuration should reach more than 7000 points.

when i run the benchmark with an ati 9100 on the same pc i get more than 
8000..</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 9 Jul 2003 15:40:36 PST</pubDate>
  </item>

  <item rdf:about="http://www.nvidiaforums.com/doom-III-performance-t80602.html">
    <link>http://www.nvidiaforums.com/doom-III-performance-t80602.html</link>
    <title>doom III performance</title>
    <description>Hi, I have a TnT2 Vanta card and a pentium pro 300 mhz. I wonder if its
possible to play doom III at the lowest settings.</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 8 Jul 2003 12:26:08 PST</pubDate>
  </item>

  <rdf:Description rdf:ID="manifest">
    <mn:channels>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.nvidiaforums.com/viewforum.php?f=4&amp;fx=Performance" />
      </rdf:Seq>
    </mn:channels>
  </rdf:Description>

</rdf:RDF>
